Skip to Content
Main content

ONEIDA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,927
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,190

LEVEL 1

2,652

32%

LEVEL 2

2,611

32%

LEVEL 3

1,807

22%

LEVEL 4

1,120

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,225
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,292

LEVEL 1

3,291

35%

LEVEL 2

2,776

30%

LEVEL 3

2,029

22%

LEVEL 4

1,196

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,373
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,907

LEVEL 1

1,188

30%

LEVEL 2

1,346

34%

LEVEL 3

865

22%

LEVEL 4

508

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,554
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,479

LEVEL 1

1,561

35%

LEVEL 2

1,364

30%

LEVEL 3

983

22%

LEVEL 4

571

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,554
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,283

LEVEL 1

1,464

34%

LEVEL 2

1,265

30%

LEVEL 3

942

22%

LEVEL 4

612

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,671
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,813

LEVEL 1

1,730

36%

LEVEL 2

1,412

29%

LEVEL 3

1,046

22%

LEVEL 4

625

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

125

40%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

229
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 767

LEVEL 1

327

43%

LEVEL 2

211

28%

LEVEL 3

129

17%

LEVEL 4

100

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

270
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 880

LEVEL 1

352

40%

LEVEL 2

258

29%

LEVEL 3

157

18%

LEVEL 4

113

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,309
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,457

LEVEL 1

1,371

25%

LEVEL 2

1,777

33%

LEVEL 3

1,410

26%

LEVEL 4

899

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,552
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,028

LEVEL 1

1,616

27%

LEVEL 2

1,860

31%

LEVEL 3

1,590

26%

LEVEL 4

962

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

126
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 945

LEVEL 1

529

56%

LEVEL 2

290

31%

LEVEL 3

87

9%

LEVEL 4

39

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

127
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,157

LEVEL 1

730

63%

LEVEL 2

300

26%

LEVEL 3

95

8%

LEVEL 4

32

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

171
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 726

LEVEL 1

324

45%

LEVEL 2

231

32%

LEVEL 3

120

17%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

181
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 887

LEVEL 1

456

51%

LEVEL 2

250

28%

LEVEL 3

124

14%

LEVEL 4

57

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,841
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,022

LEVEL 1

1,780

25%

LEVEL 2

2,401

34%

LEVEL 3

1,740

25%

LEVEL 4

1,101

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,152
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,981

LEVEL 1

2,281

29%

LEVEL 2

2,548

32%

LEVEL 3

1,971

25%

LEVEL 4

1,181

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

86
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,168

LEVEL 1

872

75%

LEVEL 2

210

18%

LEVEL 3

67

6%

LEVEL 4

19

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

73
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,311

LEVEL 1

1,010

77%

LEVEL 2

228

17%

LEVEL 3

58

4%

LEVEL 4

15

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,892
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,507

LEVEL 1

2,159

29%

LEVEL 2

2,456

33%

LEVEL 3

1,779

24%

LEVEL 4

1,113

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,439

LEVEL 1

2,691

32%

LEVEL 2

2,581

31%

LEVEL 3

1,985

24%

LEVEL 4

1,182

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

493

72%

LEVEL 2

155

23%

LEVEL 3

28

4%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 853

LEVEL 1

600

70%

LEVEL 2

195

23%

LEVEL 3

44

5%

LEVEL 4

14

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,658
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,153

LEVEL 1

525

17%

LEVEL 2

970

31%

LEVEL 3

951

30%

LEVEL 4

707

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,874
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,621

LEVEL 1

696

19%

LEVEL 2

1,051

29%

LEVEL 3

1,121

31%

LEVEL 4

753

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,269
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,037

LEVEL 1

2,127

42%

LEVEL 2

1,641

33%

LEVEL 3

856

17%

LEVEL 4

413

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,351
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,671

LEVEL 1

2,595

46%

LEVEL 2

1,725

30%

LEVEL 3

908

16%

LEVEL 4

443

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,924
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,183

LEVEL 1

2,649

32%

LEVEL 2

2,610

32%

LEVEL 3

1,805

22%

LEVEL 4

1,119

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.