Skip to Content
Main content

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,089
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,625

LEVEL 1

2,352

36%

LEVEL 2

2,184

33%

LEVEL 3

1,337

20%

LEVEL 4

752

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,309
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,857

LEVEL 1

2,374

35%

LEVEL 2

2,174

32%

LEVEL 3

1,470

21%

LEVEL 4

839

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

963
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,169

LEVEL 1

1,088

34%

LEVEL 2

1,118

35%

LEVEL 3

621

20%

LEVEL 4

342

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,267

LEVEL 1

1,072

33%

LEVEL 2

1,078

33%

LEVEL 3

723

22%

LEVEL 4

394

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,126
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,456

LEVEL 1

1,264

37%

LEVEL 2

1,066

31%

LEVEL 3

716

21%

LEVEL 4

410

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,590

LEVEL 1

1,302

36%

LEVEL 2

1,096

31%

LEVEL 3

747

21%

LEVEL 4

445

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

160

47%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

35

56%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,823
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,070

LEVEL 1

1,487

29%

LEVEL 2

1,760

35%

LEVEL 3

1,139

22%

LEVEL 4

684

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,999
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,203

LEVEL 1

1,488

29%

LEVEL 2

1,716

33%

LEVEL 3

1,256

24%

LEVEL 4

743

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

95

67%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

94

64%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

132
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 966

LEVEL 1

565

58%

LEVEL 2

269

28%

LEVEL 3

104

11%

LEVEL 4

28

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

171
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,043

LEVEL 1

589

56%

LEVEL 2

283

27%

LEVEL 3

116

11%

LEVEL 4

55

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,055
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,747

LEVEL 1

1,669

29%

LEVEL 2

2,023

35%

LEVEL 3

1,311

23%

LEVEL 4

744

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,255
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,916

LEVEL 1

1,636

28%

LEVEL 2

2,025

34%

LEVEL 3

1,426

24%

LEVEL 4

829

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 878

LEVEL 1

683

78%

LEVEL 2

161

18%

LEVEL 3

26

3%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

54
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 941

LEVEL 1

738

78%

LEVEL 2

149

16%

LEVEL 3

44

5%

LEVEL 4

10

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,086
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,367

LEVEL 1

2,126

33%

LEVEL 2

2,155

34%

LEVEL 3

1,335

21%

LEVEL 4

751

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,299
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,587

LEVEL 1

2,147

33%

LEVEL 2

2,141

33%

LEVEL 3

1,460

22%

LEVEL 4

839

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

226

88%

LEVEL 2

29

11%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

227

84%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,245
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,720

LEVEL 1

556

20%

LEVEL 2

919

34%

LEVEL 3

753

28%

LEVEL 4

492

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,335
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,841

LEVEL 1

590

21%

LEVEL 2

916

32%

LEVEL 3

789

28%

LEVEL 4

546

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

844
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,905

LEVEL 1

1,796

46%

LEVEL 2

1,265

32%

LEVEL 3

584

15%

LEVEL 4

260

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

974
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,016

LEVEL 1

1,784

44%

LEVEL 2

1,258

31%

LEVEL 3

681

17%

LEVEL 4

293

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,086
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,601

LEVEL 1

2,340

35%

LEVEL 2

2,175

33%

LEVEL 3

1,336

20%

LEVEL 4

750

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,304
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,828

LEVEL 1

2,361

35%

LEVEL 2

2,163

32%

LEVEL 3

1,465

21%

LEVEL 4

839

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.