YATES COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

203

32%

LEVEL 2

221

35%

LEVEL 3

139

22%

LEVEL 4

77

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

188

29%

LEVEL 2

228

35%

LEVEL 3

164

25%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

87

28%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

108

32%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

101

30%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

184

31%

LEVEL 2

204

35%

LEVEL 3

129

22%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

217
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

173

29%

LEVEL 2

207

35%

LEVEL 3

151

25%

LEVEL 4

66

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

108

21%

LEVEL 2

196

38%

LEVEL 3

131

26%

LEVEL 4

76

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

109

20%

LEVEL 2

206

38%

LEVEL 3

159

29%

LEVEL 4

73

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

95

74%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

79

75%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

148

40%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

144

36%

LEVEL 2

148

37%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.