LIVONIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

102

18%

LEVEL 2

192

33%

LEVEL 3

154

27%

LEVEL 4

132

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

128

22%

LEVEL 2

149

26%

LEVEL 3

170

29%

LEVEL 4

136

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

71

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

73

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

280
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

181

33%

LEVEL 3

152

27%

LEVEL 4

128

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

297
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

114

21%

LEVEL 2

136

25%

LEVEL 3

162

30%

LEVEL 4

135

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

68

13%

LEVEL 2

180

34%

LEVEL 3

152

29%

LEVEL 4

130

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

81

16%

LEVEL 2

137

26%

LEVEL 3

168

32%

LEVEL 4

135

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

34

68%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

47

76%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

304
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

124

21%

LEVEL 2

149

26%

LEVEL 3

168

29%

LEVEL 4

136

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

224
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

106

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

239
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

95

25%

LEVEL 3

126

33%

LEVEL 4

113

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

82

40%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.