PEMBROKE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

105

32%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

54

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

10

67%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

60

19%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

54

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

27

49%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

35

58%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.