Skip to Content
Main content

IROQUOIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

102

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

58

22%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

110

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

51

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

58

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

51

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

52

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

88

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

91

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

19

59%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

101

44%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

108

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

92

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

93

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

14

26%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

17

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.