HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

371
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

72

12%

LEVEL 2

162

27%

LEVEL 3

193

32%

LEVEL 4

178

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

438
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

89

12%

LEVEL 2

187

26%

LEVEL 3

233

33%

LEVEL 4

205

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

104

37%

LEVEL 4

70

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

87

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

197
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

108

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

236
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

118

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

341
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

148

27%

LEVEL 3

180

33%

LEVEL 4

161

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

407
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

76

12%

LEVEL 2

166

26%

LEVEL 3

217

33%

LEVEL 4

190

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

366
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

191

35%

LEVEL 4

175

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

427
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

50

8%

LEVEL 2

165

26%

LEVEL 3

224

35%

LEVEL 4

203

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

35

55%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

39

54%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

343
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

130

25%

LEVEL 3

174

34%

LEVEL 4

169

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

392
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

145

25%

LEVEL 3

205

35%

LEVEL 4

187

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

33

35%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.