WILLIAMSON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

105

28%

LEVEL 2

142

38%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

101

26%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

132

43%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

121

37%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

49

78%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

51

78%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

74

43%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

79

40%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

102

28%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.