Skip to Content
Main content

SOMERS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

58

14%

LEVEL 2

140

33%

LEVEL 3

124

30%

LEVEL 4

98

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

79

20%

LEVEL 2

151

37%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

50

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

200
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

92

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

30

48%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

41

64%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

213
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

117

30%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

67

18%

LEVEL 2

140

37%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.