PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

115

24%

LEVEL 3

137

29%

LEVEL 4

178

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

143

31%

LEVEL 4

149

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

88

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

82

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

90

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

67

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

19

59%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

15

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

14

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

131

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

79

24%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

106

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

177

42%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

137

33%

LEVEL 4

147

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

172

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

281
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

136

32%

LEVEL 4

145

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.