H C CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

56

17%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

179

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

48

15%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

168

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

15%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

88

52%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

84

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

91

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

84

53%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

19

76%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

19

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

150

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

139

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

39

13%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

175

59%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

164

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

178

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

256
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

44

14%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

164

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.