Skip to Content
Main content

GANANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

69

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

71

24%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

57

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

51

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

23

79%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

70

35%

LEVEL 4

51

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

31

33%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

35

36%

LEVEL 2

38

40%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.