NEWARK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

140

49%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

59

40%

LEVEL 2

64

43%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

64

50%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

52

37%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

76

49%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

95

44%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

96

45%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

17

45%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

21

57%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

86

33%

LEVEL 2

109

42%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

102

42%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

25

81%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

38

88%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

136

49%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

48

42%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

37

35%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

84

48%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

103

58%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.