HUDSON FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

238

32%

LEVEL 2

274

37%

LEVEL 3

138

19%

LEVEL 4

91

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 818

LEVEL 1

271

33%

LEVEL 2

281

34%

LEVEL 3

188

23%

LEVEL 4

78

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

134

33%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

132

34%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

137

33%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

211

32%

LEVEL 2

237

36%

LEVEL 3

126

19%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

236
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

245

34%

LEVEL 2

249

34%

LEVEL 3

167

23%

LEVEL 4

69

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

130

22%

LEVEL 2

231

40%

LEVEL 3

131

23%

LEVEL 4

88

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

152

24%

LEVEL 2

233

36%

LEVEL 3

181

28%

LEVEL 4

75

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

108

67%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

119

67%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

74

23%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

165

39%

LEVEL 2

161

39%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

197

40%

LEVEL 2

172

35%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.