HUDSON FALLS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

117

42%

LEVEL 2

121

43%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

119

36%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

51

44%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

66

40%

LEVEL 2

72

44%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

105

42%

LEVEL 2

109

43%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

110

36%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

73

34%

LEVEL 2

105

48%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

71

27%

LEVEL 2

101

39%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

44

71%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

48

67%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

45

34%

LEVEL 2

55

42%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

72

49%

LEVEL 2

66

45%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.