Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENSBURY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

106

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

118

29%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

91

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

61

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

52

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

97

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

104

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

115

34%

LEVEL 4

89

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

27

66%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

49

78%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

94

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

26

26%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.