LAKE GEORGE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

66

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

38

22%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

40

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

104

36%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

32

71%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

29

66%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

34

40%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

34

33%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.