Skip to Content
Main content

DRYDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

161

34%

LEVEL 2

164

35%

LEVEL 3

93

20%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

146

32%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

95

21%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

66

30%

LEVEL 2

92

42%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

64

30%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

82

34%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

148

34%

LEVEL 2

150

35%

LEVEL 3

83

19%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

132

32%

LEVEL 2

134

33%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

89

23%

LEVEL 2

154

39%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

140

37%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

72

86%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

60

77%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

51

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

115

49%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

104

48%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.