Skip to Content
Main content

CANDOR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

119

45%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

113

42%

LEVEL 2

100

38%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

65

47%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

57

41%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

54

43%

LEVEL 2

54

43%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

56

44%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

106

44%

LEVEL 2

102

42%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

107

43%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

98

46%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

74

34%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

38

78%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

39

81%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

45

34%

LEVEL 2

61

46%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

39

30%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

74

56%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

74

54%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.