Skip to Content
Main content

SULLIVAN WEST CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

21

78%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

21

66%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.