HORNELL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

296

45%

LEVEL 2

224

34%

LEVEL 3

103

16%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

307

47%

LEVEL 2

214

33%

LEVEL 3

108

16%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

133

42%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

141

44%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

163

49%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

166

50%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

255

44%

LEVEL 2

201

35%

LEVEL 3

96

17%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

266

45%

LEVEL 2

189

32%

LEVEL 3

102

17%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

202

37%

LEVEL 2

214

39%

LEVEL 3

102

19%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

210

38%

LEVEL 2

203

37%

LEVEL 3

106

19%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

94

89%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

97

88%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

241

53%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

247

54%

LEVEL 2

147

32%

LEVEL 3

52

11%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.