HORNELL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

130

40%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

139

39%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

56

34%

LEVEL 2

67

41%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

66

36%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

74

45%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

73

43%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

118

39%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

118

37%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

81

30%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

49

88%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

48

86%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

24

23%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

39

38%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

106

48%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

120

48%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.