Skip to Content
Main content

BATH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

80

27%

LEVEL 2

117

40%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

111

31%

LEVEL 2

136

38%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

59

35%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

77

27%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

103

44%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

35

61%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

45

70%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

50

41%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.