WATKINS GLEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

129

32%

LEVEL 2

158

40%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

152

38%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

84

44%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

76

41%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

91

41%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

114

32%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

66

18%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

136

38%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

144

44%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

100

29%

LEVEL 2

133

39%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

53

78%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

52

83%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

92

41%

LEVEL 2

90

40%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

106

49%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.