ODESSA-MONTOUR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

129

43%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

112

39%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

60

42%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

69

43%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

123

43%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

105

39%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

45

87%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

42

84%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

87

52%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

71

46%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.