SCHALMONT CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

106

20%

LEVEL 2

190

36%

LEVEL 3

147

28%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

123

22%

LEVEL 2

215

38%

LEVEL 3

149

27%

LEVEL 4

74

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

167

36%

LEVEL 3

131

28%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

101

21%

LEVEL 2

185

38%

LEVEL 3

132

27%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

69

14%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

144

30%

LEVEL 4

85

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

84

17%

LEVEL 2

204

40%

LEVEL 3

148

29%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

37

69%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

39

75%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

141

35%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

81

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

151

37%

LEVEL 3

123

30%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

52

41%

LEVEL 2

49

38%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

55

35%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.