Skip to Content
Main content

CORINTH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

145

32%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

71

37%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

141

32%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

100

23%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

116

34%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

114

28%

LEVEL 2

151

37%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

86

45%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

89

39%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.