ORENDA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

89

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

104

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

35

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

46

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

54

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

58

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

14

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

66

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

47

23%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

78

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

89

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

103

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

179
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

101

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

83

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

98

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.