POTSDAM CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

104

21%

LEVEL 2

187

38%

LEVEL 3

118

24%

LEVEL 4

88

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

118

22%

LEVEL 2

183

35%

LEVEL 3

145

27%

LEVEL 4

83

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

74

26%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

96

21%

LEVEL 2

173

38%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

109

22%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

131

27%

LEVEL 4

75

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

170

39%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

67

15%

LEVEL 2

165

36%

LEVEL 3

142

31%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

40

67%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

51

70%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

77

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

111

34%

LEVEL 4

68

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

74

38%

LEVEL 2

80

41%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

79

39%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.