Skip to Content
Main content

A A KINGSTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

112

37%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

25

74%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

40

38%

LEVEL 2

47

44%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

51

44%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.