Skip to Content
Main content

NORWOOD-NORFOLK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

120

34%

LEVEL 2

156

44%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

156

40%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

53

30%

LEVEL 2

80

46%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

67

37%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

75

40%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

150

44%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

149

39%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

146

47%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

37

77%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

50

76%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

75

48%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

89

44%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

117

51%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.