Skip to Content
Main content

GOUVERNEUR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

162

38%

LEVEL 2

150

35%

LEVEL 3

81

19%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

212

47%

LEVEL 2

146

32%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

91

44%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

100

43%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

121

50%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

154

38%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

204

47%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

100

29%

LEVEL 2

136

39%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

142

38%

LEVEL 2

137

37%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

62

81%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

70

89%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

209

47%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

68

42%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

128

49%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

157

58%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

111
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

151

37%

LEVEL 2

147

36%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

93
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

206

47%

LEVEL 2

144

33%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.