BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

81

24%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

111

30%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

71

23%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

88

29%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

23

52%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

38

67%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

35

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

59

30%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

86

40%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.