HANNIBAL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

208

42%

LEVEL 2

166

33%

LEVEL 3

91

18%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

228

44%

LEVEL 2

173

33%

LEVEL 3

71

14%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

96

40%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

107

43%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

112

43%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

121

45%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

195

41%

LEVEL 2

157

33%

LEVEL 3

87

18%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

207

43%

LEVEL 2

165

34%

LEVEL 3

69

14%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

150

34%

LEVEL 2

162

37%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

175

39%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

69

15%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

58

91%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

53

82%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

42

29%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

166

47%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

181

48%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.