Skip to Content
Main content

FULTON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

130

43%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

202

49%

LEVEL 2

155

38%

LEVEL 3

44

11%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

63

45%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

85

43%

LEVEL 2

86

43%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

67

42%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

117

55%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

185

48%

LEVEL 2

151

39%

LEVEL 3

40

10%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

122

38%

LEVEL 2

146

45%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

52

85%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

80

90%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

57

46%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

103

59%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

162

62%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

8

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.