Skip to Content
Main content

VICTOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

128

35%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

69

44%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

125

39%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

24

55%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

128

37%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

117

40%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

23

48%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

26

38%

LEVEL 2

30

44%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.