TULLY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

106

34%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

52

38%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

89

38%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

26

67%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

76

41%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

89

43%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

36

40%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

47

46%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.