Skip to Content
Main content

DANFORTH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

283

84%

LEVEL 2

45

13%

LEVEL 3

9

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

300

90%

LEVEL 2

29

9%

LEVEL 3

4

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

132

83%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

119

89%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

151

84%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

181

91%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

15

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

14

78%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

21

84%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

232

85%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

5

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

235

91%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

3

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

28

78%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

25

89%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

238

82%

LEVEL 2

44

15%

LEVEL 3

9

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

229

88%

LEVEL 2

26

10%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

45

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

71

96%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

42

81%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

50

89%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

241

84%

LEVEL 2

39

14%

LEVEL 3

6

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

250

90%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

3

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.