SKANEATELES CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

53

10%

LEVEL 2

148

29%

LEVEL 3

178

35%

LEVEL 4

132

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

103

22%

LEVEL 3

179

38%

LEVEL 4

151

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

82

37%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

67

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

83

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

106

41%

LEVEL 4

84

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

7

58%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

294
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

142

29%

LEVEL 3

168

34%

LEVEL 4

126

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

320
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

99

22%

LEVEL 3

173

38%

LEVEL 4

147

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

134

29%

LEVEL 3

176

37%

LEVEL 4

132

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

93

21%

LEVEL 3

178

41%

LEVEL 4

149

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

329
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

100

22%

LEVEL 3

179

38%

LEVEL 4

150

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

126

28%

LEVEL 3

165

36%

LEVEL 4

123

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

304
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

88

21%

LEVEL 3

163

39%

LEVEL 4

141

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.