MARCELLUS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

178

28%

LEVEL 3

206

33%

LEVEL 4

183

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

378
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

145

25%

LEVEL 3

211

36%

LEVEL 4

167

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

84

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

180
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

78

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

214
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

99

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

198
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

89

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

7

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

7

58%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

375
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

58

10%

LEVEL 2

173

29%

LEVEL 3

200

33%

LEVEL 4

175

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

365
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

60

11%

LEVEL 2

141

25%

LEVEL 3

203

36%

LEVEL 4

162

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

164

29%

LEVEL 3

195

34%

LEVEL 4

179

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

129

24%

LEVEL 3

205

39%

LEVEL 4

162

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

22

43%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

30

53%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

376
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

145

25%

LEVEL 3

209

36%

LEVEL 4

167

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

335
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

173

34%

LEVEL 4

162

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

298
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

156

36%

LEVEL 4

142

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

55

37%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.