Skip to Content
Main content

C S DRIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

146

29%

LEVEL 3

166

32%

LEVEL 4

154

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

128

26%

LEVEL 3

178

36%

LEVEL 4

130

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

71

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

175
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

83

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

7

58%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

308
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

142

29%

LEVEL 3

161

33%

LEVEL 4

147

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

295
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

49

10%

LEVEL 2

124

26%

LEVEL 3

170

36%

LEVEL 4

125

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

135

29%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

151

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

173

39%

LEVEL 4

126

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

139

33%

LEVEL 4

137

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

136

36%

LEVEL 4

111

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

23

20%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

42

37%

LEVEL 4

19

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.