Skip to Content
Main content

DONALD S RAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

112

22%

LEVEL 2

180

35%

LEVEL 3

151

29%

LEVEL 4

74

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

92

16%

LEVEL 2

189

34%

LEVEL 3

188

34%

LEVEL 4

91

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

54

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

162

36%

LEVEL 3

142

31%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

255
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

168

34%

LEVEL 3

173

35%

LEVEL 4

82

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

59

13%

LEVEL 2

165

37%

LEVEL 3

149

34%

LEVEL 4

71

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

175

35%

LEVEL 3

187

37%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

53

73%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

44

75%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

164

39%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

54

42%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

53

39%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.