Skip to Content
Main content

CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

98

25%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

125

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

108

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

56

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

58

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

69

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

50

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

114

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

102

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

87

25%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

124

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

108

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

25

57%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

26

53%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

113

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

88

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

22

25%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

20

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.