PS 90 HORACE MANN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

75

20%

LEVEL 2

157

41%

LEVEL 3

104

27%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

164

40%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

94

45%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

82
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

33

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

44

22%

LEVEL 2

91

46%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

108

48%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

123

40%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

27

34%

LEVEL 2

34

43%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

37

49%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

146
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

56

16%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

154
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.