Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #27 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,844
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,610

LEVEL 1

6,657

32%

LEVEL 2

7,109

34%

LEVEL 3

4,037

20%

LEVEL 4

2,807

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,986
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,503

LEVEL 1

6,961

34%

LEVEL 2

6,556

32%

LEVEL 3

4,028

20%

LEVEL 4

2,958

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,403
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,921

LEVEL 1

3,060

31%

LEVEL 2

3,458

35%

LEVEL 3

2,013

20%

LEVEL 4

1,390

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,423
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,838

LEVEL 1

3,118

32%

LEVEL 2

3,297

34%

LEVEL 3

1,951

20%

LEVEL 4

1,472

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,441
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,689

LEVEL 1

3,597

34%

LEVEL 2

3,651

34%

LEVEL 3

2,024

19%

LEVEL 4

1,417

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,563
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,665

LEVEL 1

3,843

36%

LEVEL 2

3,259

31%

LEVEL 3

2,077

19%

LEVEL 4

1,486

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

38
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

18

22%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

52
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

27

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

243
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

258

34%

LEVEL 2

269

35%

LEVEL 3

140

18%

LEVEL 4

103

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

278
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 876

LEVEL 1

308

35%

LEVEL 2

290

33%

LEVEL 3

160

18%

LEVEL 4

118

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,471
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,977

LEVEL 1

893

18%

LEVEL 2

1,613

32%

LEVEL 3

1,252

25%

LEVEL 4

1,219

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,499
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,941

LEVEL 1

973

20%

LEVEL 2

1,469

30%

LEVEL 3

1,240

25%

LEVEL 4

1,259

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,084
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,183

LEVEL 1

461

21%

LEVEL 2

638

29%

LEVEL 3

577

26%

LEVEL 4

507

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,058
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,095

LEVEL 1

432

21%

LEVEL 2

605

29%

LEVEL 3

548

26%

LEVEL 4

510

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

812
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,952

LEVEL 1

2,413

49%

LEVEL 2

1,727

35%

LEVEL 3

575

12%

LEVEL 4

237

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

842
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,621

LEVEL 1

2,343

51%

LEVEL 2

1,436

31%

LEVEL 3

610

13%

LEVEL 4

232

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,196
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,645

LEVEL 1

2,614

34%

LEVEL 2

2,835

37%

LEVEL 3

1,476

19%

LEVEL 4

720

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,257
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,860

LEVEL 1

2,876

37%

LEVEL 2

2,727

35%

LEVEL 3

1,445

18%

LEVEL 4

812

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,350
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,268

LEVEL 1

3,977

24%

LEVEL 2

5,941

37%

LEVEL 3

3,675

23%

LEVEL 4

2,675

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,499
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,257

LEVEL 1

4,325

27%

LEVEL 2

5,433

33%

LEVEL 3

3,669

23%

LEVEL 4

2,830

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

494
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,342

LEVEL 1

2,680

62%

LEVEL 2

1,168

27%

LEVEL 3

362

8%

LEVEL 4

132

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

487
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,246

LEVEL 1

2,636

62%

LEVEL 2

1,123

26%

LEVEL 3

359

8%

LEVEL 4

128

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,694
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,887

LEVEL 1

5,546

29%

LEVEL 2

6,647

35%

LEVEL 3

3,935

21%

LEVEL 4

2,759

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,750
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,435

LEVEL 1

5,668

31%

LEVEL 2

6,017

33%

LEVEL 3

3,850

21%

LEVEL 4

2,900

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,723

LEVEL 1

1,111

64%

LEVEL 2

462

27%

LEVEL 3

102

6%

LEVEL 4

48

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

236
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,068

LEVEL 1

1,293

63%

LEVEL 2

539

26%

LEVEL 3

178

9%

LEVEL 4

58

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,068
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,856

LEVEL 1

1,232

25%

LEVEL 2

1,556

32%

LEVEL 3

1,104

23%

LEVEL 4

964

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,196
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,079

LEVEL 1

1,366

27%

LEVEL 2

1,517

30%

LEVEL 3

1,184

23%

LEVEL 4

1,012

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,776
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,754

LEVEL 1

5,425

34%

LEVEL 2

5,553

35%

LEVEL 3

2,933

19%

LEVEL 4

1,843

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,790
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,424

LEVEL 1

5,595

36%

LEVEL 2

5,039

33%

LEVEL 3

2,844

18%

LEVEL 4

1,946

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.