Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 113 ANTHONY J PRANZO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

75

11%

LEVEL 2

183

28%

LEVEL 3

216

33%

LEVEL 4

181

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

72

11%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

204

32%

LEVEL 4

151

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

92

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

73

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

195
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

89

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

12

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

15

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

115

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

113

34%

LEVEL 4

89

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

136
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

120
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

93

37%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

156

27%

LEVEL 3

202

35%

LEVEL 4

180

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

165

30%

LEVEL 3

196

36%

LEVEL 4

149

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

41

49%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

38

45%

LEVEL 2

36

43%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

390
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

69

11%

LEVEL 2

179

28%

LEVEL 3

211

33%

LEVEL 4

179

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

349
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

65

11%

LEVEL 2

196

32%

LEVEL 3

201

33%

LEVEL 4

148

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

82

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

153

35%

LEVEL 4

99

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

119

30%

LEVEL 4

85

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.