Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #24 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,703
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,444

LEVEL 1

6,901

26%

LEVEL 2

8,840

33%

LEVEL 3

5,838

22%

LEVEL 4

4,865

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,968
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,943

LEVEL 1

7,452

28%

LEVEL 2

8,523

32%

LEVEL 3

6,008

22%

LEVEL 4

4,960

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,180
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,703

LEVEL 1

3,133

25%

LEVEL 2

4,390

35%

LEVEL 3

2,861

23%

LEVEL 4

2,319

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,307
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,958

LEVEL 1

3,470

27%

LEVEL 2

4,181

32%

LEVEL 3

2,877

22%

LEVEL 4

2,430

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,523
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,741

LEVEL 1

3,768

27%

LEVEL 2

4,450

32%

LEVEL 3

2,977

22%

LEVEL 4

2,546

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,661
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,985

LEVEL 1

3,982

28%

LEVEL 2

4,342

31%

LEVEL 3

3,131

22%

LEVEL 4

2,530

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

12

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

47
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

23

24%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

24

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,734
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,489

LEVEL 1

548

10%

LEVEL 2

1,207

22%

LEVEL 3

1,522

28%

LEVEL 4

2,212

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,836
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,621

LEVEL 1

582

10%

LEVEL 2

1,203

21%

LEVEL 3

1,575

28%

LEVEL 4

2,261

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,032
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,666

LEVEL 1

575

16%

LEVEL 2

1,059

29%

LEVEL 3

1,001

27%

LEVEL 4

1,031

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,071
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,662

LEVEL 1

579

16%

LEVEL 2

1,012

28%

LEVEL 3

1,035

28%

LEVEL 4

1,036

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

97
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

183

40%

LEVEL 2

175

38%

LEVEL 3

58

13%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

103
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

180

40%

LEVEL 2

169

37%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,771
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,692

LEVEL 1

5,561

33%

LEVEL 2

6,360

38%

LEVEL 3

3,224

19%

LEVEL 4

1,547

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,868
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,042

LEVEL 1

6,079

36%

LEVEL 2

6,095

36%

LEVEL 3

3,282

19%

LEVEL 4

1,586

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,137
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,429

LEVEL 1

4,038

19%

LEVEL 2

7,254

34%

LEVEL 3

5,425

25%

LEVEL 4

4,712

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,340
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,822

LEVEL 1

4,470

20%

LEVEL 2

7,012

32%

LEVEL 3

5,527

25%

LEVEL 4

4,813

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

566
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,015

LEVEL 1

2,863

57%

LEVEL 2

1,586

32%

LEVEL 3

413

8%

LEVEL 4

153

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

628
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,121

LEVEL 1

2,982

58%

LEVEL 2

1,511

30%

LEVEL 3

481

9%

LEVEL 4

147

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,124
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,245

LEVEL 1

3,910

18%

LEVEL 2

7,211

34%

LEVEL 3

5,384

25%

LEVEL 4

4,740

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,198
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,900

LEVEL 1

4,043

19%

LEVEL 2

6,659

32%

LEVEL 3

5,421

26%

LEVEL 4

4,777

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

579
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,199

LEVEL 1

2,991

58%

LEVEL 2

1,629

31%

LEVEL 3

454

9%

LEVEL 4

125

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

770
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,043

LEVEL 1

3,409

56%

LEVEL 2

1,864

31%

LEVEL 3

587

10%

LEVEL 4

183

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,631
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,332

LEVEL 1

1,511

21%

LEVEL 2

2,190

30%

LEVEL 3

1,781

24%

LEVEL 4

1,850

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,925
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,832

LEVEL 1

1,662

21%

LEVEL 2

2,245

29%

LEVEL 3

1,959

25%

LEVEL 4

1,966

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,072
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,112

LEVEL 1

5,390

28%

LEVEL 2

6,650

35%

LEVEL 3

4,057

21%

LEVEL 4

3,015

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,043
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,111

LEVEL 1

5,790

30%

LEVEL 2

6,278

33%

LEVEL 3

4,049

21%

LEVEL 4

2,994

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.