Skip to Content
Main content

PS 206 JOSEPH F LAMB GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

476
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 832

LEVEL 1

124

15%

LEVEL 2

232

28%

LEVEL 3

215

26%

LEVEL 4

261

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

503
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 873

LEVEL 1

148

17%

LEVEL 2

222

25%

LEVEL 3

253

29%

LEVEL 4

250

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

128

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

256
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

126

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

244
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

133

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

247
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

116

26%

LEVEL 3

123

28%

LEVEL 4

124

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

279
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

81

20%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

177

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

309
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

74

17%

LEVEL 3

138

32%

LEVEL 4

171

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

76

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

73

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

32

46%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

22

32%

LEVEL 2

29

43%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

449
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

82

11%

LEVEL 2

191

26%

LEVEL 3

199

28%

LEVEL 4

250

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

479
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 771

LEVEL 1

99

13%

LEVEL 2

193

25%

LEVEL 3

236

31%

LEVEL 4

243

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

42

38%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

49

48%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

439
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

77

11%

LEVEL 2

192

27%

LEVEL 3

187

26%

LEVEL 4

252

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

470
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

93

13%

LEVEL 2

174

24%

LEVEL 3

229

31%

LEVEL 4

241

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

47

38%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

55

40%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

84

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

81

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

315
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

116

19%

LEVEL 2

190

31%

LEVEL 3

138

22%

LEVEL 4

177

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

134

20%

LEVEL 2

177

26%

LEVEL 3

191

28%

LEVEL 4

169

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.