Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #22 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,051
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,664

LEVEL 1

3,981

27%

LEVEL 2

4,632

32%

LEVEL 3

3,141

21%

LEVEL 4

2,910

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,274
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,496

LEVEL 1

3,934

27%

LEVEL 2

4,288

30%

LEVEL 3

3,356

23%

LEVEL 4

2,918

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,009
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,090

LEVEL 1

1,808

26%

LEVEL 2

2,273

32%

LEVEL 3

1,591

22%

LEVEL 4

1,418

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,169
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,051

LEVEL 1

1,781

25%

LEVEL 2

2,101

30%

LEVEL 3

1,717

24%

LEVEL 4

1,452

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,042
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,574

LEVEL 1

2,173

29%

LEVEL 2

2,359

31%

LEVEL 3

1,550

20%

LEVEL 4

1,492

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,105
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,445

LEVEL 1

2,153

29%

LEVEL 2

2,187

29%

LEVEL 3

1,639

22%

LEVEL 4

1,466

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

57
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

34

31%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

82
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

45

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

39
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

46

36%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,521
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,454

LEVEL 1

331

13%

LEVEL 2

602

25%

LEVEL 3

627

26%

LEVEL 4

894

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,587
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,564

LEVEL 1

395

15%

LEVEL 2

582

23%

LEVEL 3

690

27%

LEVEL 4

897

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,448
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,160

LEVEL 1

625

15%

LEVEL 2

1,087

26%

LEVEL 3

1,125

27%

LEVEL 4

1,323

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,452
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,159

LEVEL 1

642

15%

LEVEL 2

1,065

26%

LEVEL 3

1,190

29%

LEVEL 4

1,262

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,345
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,648

LEVEL 1

2,255

40%

LEVEL 2

2,048

36%

LEVEL 3

929

16%

LEVEL 4

416

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,392
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,326

LEVEL 1

2,075

39%

LEVEL 2

1,859

35%

LEVEL 3

945

18%

LEVEL 4

447

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

641
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,186

LEVEL 1

724

33%

LEVEL 2

821

38%

LEVEL 3

412

19%

LEVEL 4

229

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

709
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,184

LEVEL 1

751

34%

LEVEL 2

724

33%

LEVEL 3

464

21%

LEVEL 4

245

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,627
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,573

LEVEL 1

2,259

20%

LEVEL 2

3,687

32%

LEVEL 3

2,843

25%

LEVEL 4

2,784

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,852
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,593

LEVEL 1

2,259

19%

LEVEL 2

3,482

30%

LEVEL 3

3,066

26%

LEVEL 4

2,786

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

424
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,091

LEVEL 1

1,722

56%

LEVEL 2

945

31%

LEVEL 3

298

10%

LEVEL 4

126

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

422
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,903

LEVEL 1

1,675

58%

LEVEL 2

806

28%

LEVEL 3

290

10%

LEVEL 4

132

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,836
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,182

LEVEL 1

3,190

24%

LEVEL 2

4,156

32%

LEVEL 3

2,987

23%

LEVEL 4

2,849

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,992
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,838

LEVEL 1

3,067

24%

LEVEL 2

3,779

29%

LEVEL 3

3,155

25%

LEVEL 4

2,837

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,482

LEVEL 1

791

53%

LEVEL 2

476

32%

LEVEL 3

154

10%

LEVEL 4

61

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

282
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,658

LEVEL 1

867

52%

LEVEL 2

509

31%

LEVEL 3

201

12%

LEVEL 4

81

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,504
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,594

LEVEL 1

850

19%

LEVEL 2

1,240

27%

LEVEL 3

1,167

25%

LEVEL 4

1,337

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,539
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,491

LEVEL 1

802

18%

LEVEL 2

1,150

26%

LEVEL 3

1,228

27%

LEVEL 4

1,311

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,547
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,070

LEVEL 1

3,131

31%

LEVEL 2

3,392

34%

LEVEL 3

1,974

20%

LEVEL 4

1,573

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,735
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,005

LEVEL 1

3,132

31%

LEVEL 2

3,138

31%

LEVEL 3

2,128

21%

LEVEL 4

1,607

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.