Skip to Content
Main content

PS 109 SEDGWICK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

207

59%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

158

50%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

111

64%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

71

50%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

96

53%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

87

49%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

160

58%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

120

47%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

137

52%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

114

45%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

70

77%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

44

69%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

149

56%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

109

45%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

58

67%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

49

64%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

192

59%

LEVEL 2

76

23%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

140

48%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.